高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Comparison of CT and MRI in imaging diagnosis of aortic dissection

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Hebei Univ,Affiliated Hosp,CT MRI Room,Baoding,Hebei,Peoples R China [2]Hebei Univ,Affiliated Hosp,Dept Cardiol,Baoding,Hebei,Peoples R China [3]PLA Air Force 986 Hosp, Imaging Dept, Xian 710054, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: aortic dissection CT MRI diagnosis value imaging

摘要:
Aortic dissection(AD) is a life-threatening disease due to a tear in the intimal layer of the aorta within the aortic wall. To compare diagnostic value and imaging of AD between computed tomography(CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). 120 AD patients diagnosed were examined with 64-slice CT and 1.5 MRI, the imaging data of true and false lumen, intimal flap, intimal tear, mural thrombus and aortic calcification were compared. The intimal flap rate of CT and MRI was 81.7% and 100%, respectively; The intimal tear rate of CT and MRI was 68.3% and 83.3%, respectively; The rate of mural thrombus in CT and MRI was 26.7% and 54.2%, respectively; The rate of aortic calcification in CT and MRI was 62.5% and 18.3%, respectively; The number of patients with intimal tear lower than 1mm in CT and MRI was 5 and 0, respectively. Both CT and MRI can show the true and false lumen well, but the detection rate of intimal flap, intimal tear and mural thrombosis in MRI is significantly higher than that in CT, and the detection rate of aortic calcification and intimal tear<1mm in CT is higher than that in MRI.

语种:
WOS:

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2022版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2021版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Hebei Univ,Affiliated Hosp,CT MRI Room,Baoding,Hebei,Peoples R China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:15101 今日访问量:4 总访问量:964 更新日期:2025-05-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 河北大学附属医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:保定市莲池区裕华东路212号