高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Efficacy and Safety of Endorectal Advancement Flap for the Treatment of Anal Fistula: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

文献详情

资源类型:
Pubmed体系:
机构: [1]Graduate School, Hebei University of Chinese Medicine, 050091 Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China [2]Department of Anorectal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University of Chinese Medicine, 050000 Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: anal fistula; ERAF; fecal incontinence; meta-analysis

摘要:
Complex anal fistula poses a significant challenge for anorectal surgeons due to its high risks of recurrence and incontinence. A sphincter-preserving procedure named endorectal advancement flap (ERAF) is gradually being applied to clinical practice. Therefore, this meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ERAF in managing anal fistula.We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases for relevant manuscripts published from 29 August 2003 to 29 August 2023. Among these studies, outcomes included healing rate, recurrence rate, incontinence rate, and complications. Furthermore, the quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The heterogeneity was determined using the chi-squared test and I2 statistic. A random effects model was applied if significant heterogeneity (p < 0.05 and I2 > 50%) was observed. Sensitivity analysis was conducted by excluding studies with a high risk of bias.Thirty-eight studies were included in the present analysis, involving 1559 participants. The pooled healing rate and recurrence rate of ERAF were 65.5% (95% confidence intervals (CI): 57.6%-73.4%) and 19.6% (95% CI: 14.8%-24.4%), respectively. The pooled incontinence rate was 10.6% (95% CI: 6.0%-15.1%). According to the subgroup analysis, the healing rate, recurrence rate, and incontinence rate of ERAF for fistula associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) were 53.9% (95% CI: 38.1%-69.7%), 32.6% (95% CI: 21.3%-43.8%), and 2.8% (95% CI: 0%-10.6%), respectively. For patients without IBD, the healing rate, recurrence rate, and incontinence rate of ERAF were 70.6% (95% CI: 63.9%-77.4%), 15.7% (95% CI: 9.9%-21.5%), and 16.5% (95% CI: 8.1%-24.9%), respectively. We observed that bleeding, local infection or abscess, flap dehiscence, and haematomas were the common complications, with incidences of 2.2% (95% CI: 0%-4.5%), 9.5% (95% CI: 4.7%-14.4%), 10.4% (95% CI: 0.0%-21.6%), and 12.4% (95% CI: 0%-27.6%), respectively.ERAF may be an optional treatment for anal fistula from the perspective of effectiveness and safety.PROSPERO: CRD42023451451.

基金:
语种:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2025]版:
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 外科
第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Graduate School, Hebei University of Chinese Medicine, 050091 Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China [2]Department of Anorectal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University of Chinese Medicine, 050000 Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:15100 今日访问量:0 总访问量:960 更新日期:2025-05-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 河北大学附属医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:保定市莲池区裕华东路212号