高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Diagnostic performance of deep learning-based vessel extraction and stenosis detection on coronary computed tomography angiography for coronary artery disease: a multi-reader multi-case study

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Ruijin Hosp, Dept Radiol, Sch Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China [2]Peking Univ Peoples Hosp, Dept Radiol, Beijing, Peoples R China [3]Tongji Univ, Shanghai East Hosp, Dept Radiol, Sch Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China [4]Nanchang Univ, Dept Radiol, Affiliated Hosp 2, Nanchang, Peoples R China [5]Hebei Univ, Dept Radiol, Affiliated Hosp, Baoding, Peoples R China [6]Shanghai United Imaging Intelligence Co Ltd, Shanghai, Peoples R China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Deep learning (DL) Coronary CT angiography (CCTA)

摘要:
BackgroundPost-processing and interpretation of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) imaging are time-consuming and dependent on the reader's experience. An automated deep learning (DL)-based imaging reconstruction and diagnosis system was developed to improve diagnostic accuracy and efficiency.MethodsOur study including 374 cases from five sites, inviting 12 radiologists, assessed the DL-based system in diagnosing obstructive coronary disease with regard to diagnostic performance, imaging post-processing and reporting time of radiologists, with invasive coronary angiography as a standard reference. The diagnostic performance of DL system and DL-assisted human readers was compared with the traditional method of human readers without DL system.ResultsComparing the diagnostic performance of human readers without DL system versus with DL system, the AUC was improved from 0.81 to 0.82 (p < 0.05) at patient level and from 0.79 to 0.81 (p < 0.05) at vessel level. An increase in AUC was observed in inexperienced radiologists (p < 0.05), but was absent in experienced radiologists. Regarding diagnostic efficiency, comparing the DL system versus human reader, the average post-processing and reporting time was decreased from 798.60 s to 189.12 s (p < 0.05). The sensitivity and specificity of using DL system alone were 93.55% and 59.57% at patient level and 83.23% and 79.97% at vessel level, respectively.ConclusionsWith the DL system serving as a concurrent reader, the overall post-processing and reading time was substantially reduced. The diagnostic accuracy of human readers, especially for inexperienced readers, was improved. DL-assisted human reader had the potential of being the reading mode of choice in clinical routine.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2025]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 核医学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 核医学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2023]版:
Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
最新[2023]版:
Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2023版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2022版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Ruijin Hosp, Dept Radiol, Sch Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:15100 今日访问量:4 总访问量:960 更新日期:2025-04-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 河北大学附属医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:保定市莲池区裕华东路212号